Filter
Top Products
F-60
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, total accounts receivable securitized and under Nortel Networks management were $359 and $423,
respectively.
There is a possibility that the actual performance of receivables or the cost of servicing the receivables will differ from the assumptions
used to determine fair values at the transfer date and at each reporting date. Assuming hypothetical, simultaneous, unfavorable variations
of up to 20 percent in credit losses, discount rate used and cost of servicing the receivables, the pre-tax impact on the value of the retained
interests and servicing assets would not be significant.
13. Guarantees
Nortel Networks has entered into agreements that contain features which meet the definition of a guarantee under FIN 45. FIN 45 defines
a guarantee as a contract that contingently requires Nortel Networks to make payments (either in cash, financial instruments, other assets,
common shares of Nortel Networks Corporation or through the provision of services) to a third party based on changes in an underlying
economic characteristic (such as interest rates or market value) that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of the guaranteed
party or a third party’s failure to perform under a specified agreement. A description of the major types of Nortel Networks outstanding
guarantees as of December 31, 2003 is provided below:
(a) Business sale and business combination a
g
reements
In connection with agreements for the sale of portions of its business, including certain discontinued operations, Nortel Networks
has typically retained the liabilities of a business which relate to events occurring prior to its sale, such as tax, environmental,
litigation and employment matters. Nortel Networks generally indemnifies the purchaser of a Nortel Networks business in the event
that a third party asserts a claim against the purchaser that relates to a liability retained by Nortel Networks. Some of these types of
guarantees have indefinite terms while others have specific terms extending to June 2008.
Nortel Networks also entered into guarantees related to the escrow of shares in business combinations in prior periods. These types
of agreements generally include indemnities that require Nortel Networks to indemnify counterparties for loss incurred from
litigation that may be suffered by counterparties arising under such agreements. These types of indemnities apply over a specified
period of time from the date of the business combinations and do not provide for any limit on the maximum potential amount.
Nortel Networks is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of indemnification guarantees as the business
sale agreements generally do not specify a maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent
events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined.
Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no significant
liability has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligations associated with these guarantees.
In conjunction with the sale of a subsidiary to a third party, Nortel Networks guaranteed to the purchaser that specified annual
volume levels would be achieved by the business sold over a ten year period ending December 31, 2007. The maximum amount
that Nortel Networks may be required to pay under the volume guarantee as of December 31, 2003 is $8. A liability of $6 has been
accrued in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligation associated with this guarantee as of December 31,
2003.
(b) Intellectual
p
ro
p
ert
y
indemnification obli
g
ations
Nortel Networks has periodically entered into agreements with customers and suppliers that include limited intellectual property
indemnification obligations that are customary in the industry. These types of guarantees typically have indefinite terms and
generally require Nortel Networks to compensate the other party for certain damages and costs incurred as a result of third party
intellectual property claims arising from these transactions.