page 5
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION
RFI — RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE
Federal Communications Commission Part 15
The EFX has been tested and found to comply with,
• the IEC EMC Directive (international electromagnetic compatibility certification)
• the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules.
These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful
interference in a commercial installation. The EFX generates, uses, and
can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accor-
dance with the owner’s manual instructions, may cause harmful interference
to radio communications. Operation of the EFX in a residential area is likely
to cause harmful interference. If this occurs, the user will be required to
correct the interference at his or her own expense.
CAUTION —
Canadian Department of Communications
This digital apparatus does not exceed the Class A limits for radio noise emissions
from digital apparatus set out in the Radio Interference Regulations of the Canadian
Department of Communications.
Le présent appareil numérique n’émet pas de bruits radioéélectriques dépassant
les limites applicables aux appareils numériques de la Class A prescrites dans le
Règlement sur le brouillage radioélectrique édicté par le ministére des Communi-
cations du Canada.
EUROPEAN APPLICATIONS
This product conforms to the requirements of the European Council Directive 89/336/
EEC, Electromagnetic Compatibility and has been tested to the following standards:
EN55022, Limits & Methods of Measurement of Radio Interference, Information
Technology Equipment (Class A).
EN50082-1, Generic Immunity Standard for Residential, Commercial and Light
Industrial Products (Class A).
This product additionally conforms to the requirements of the European Council Directive
73/23/EEC, Low Voltage Directive and has been tested to the following standard:
IEC 335-1, Safety of Household and similar Electrical Appliances.
Per FCC rules, changes or modifications to the
EFX not expressly approved by Precor, could void
the user’s authority to operate the equipment.